F2Pool Co-founder Wang Chun: Bitcoin Protocol Upgrades Should Avoid Forced Approaches Like 'Omnibus Bills'
Wang Chun, co-founder of F2Pool, stated on the X platform that Bitcoin protocol upgrades should not adopt forced approaches similar to those used by American politicians with 'omnibus bills.' This is also a key reason for his opposition to BIP-110 and BIP-54. Several issues under discussion lack actual urgency: for instance, the 'Timewarp attack' has existed for a long time but does not provide substantial benefits to miners; block validation efficiency has significantly improved due to libsecp256k1 and hardware upgrades, making protocol layer adjustments unnecessary; and the 'forgery of confirmed transactions' fundamentally relies on breaking the double SHA256 collision, which, if successful, would mean that Bitcoin's core security has been compromised. Wang Chun added that the aforementioned issues are insufficient to drive protocol modifications, and currently, only the 'duplicate transactions' issue holds some repair value, potentially being one of the few changes worth implementing.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
HIFI Raises $37M Series A to Build Settlement Rails for Tokenized Money
Report: Anthropic in talks to lease up to 1GW of data center capacity, with related investments of at least 40 billions dollars
According to media reports, Anthropic is considering renting up to 1GW of computing power from Stream Data Centers. The data center developer indicated that deploying a full 1GW of computing power would require an investment of at least 40 billion USD. Anthropic needs to provide financial guarantees for this lease and separately raise funds for the installed chips.
Meta lost the lawsuit and may face a record fine of up to 219 billions dollars.
Meta lost a lawsuit in New Mexico, USA. The jury found that Meta engaged in deceptive practices regarding public communications and data privacy policies, violating state laws. The New Mexico Attorney General described the verdict as a "milestone moment" in holding tech giants accountable and will petition the court to impose a maximum civil fine of $219 billion on Meta. Meta stated that it disagrees with the verdict and will continue to defend itself.

