Charles Hoskinson, founder of Cardano, has openly criticized Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum’s co-founder, following concerns Buterin raised about the future security of cryptographic systems in the age of artificial intelligence.
Cardano’s Hoskinson rejects Ethereum’s AI cryptography warning
Dispute over lattice cryptography
In a detailed post on X, Hoskinson responded to Buterin’s recent comments that rapid advances in AI could destabilize current cryptographic solutions, particularly lattice cryptography, within the next two years.
Buterin suggested that artificial intelligence might accelerate mathematical discovery, potentially uncovering new attack vectors and rendering existing cryptographic safeguards obsolete much more quickly than anticipated.
Buterin stated that as AI improves, it may discover mathematical shortcuts that invalidate widely adopted security protocols, raising concerns that post-quantum security could be jeopardized far sooner than experts predict.
Hoskinson dismissed these warnings as speculative and suggested that Buterin’s comments lack mathematical evidence. He stated that lattice cryptography, a core part of the post-quantum security paradigm, has been extensively researched and tested for decades, with ongoing refinements based on emerging attack strategies.
He further argued that discouraging the use of lattice cryptography could undermine efforts to secure digital communications against threats from future quantum computers. Hoskinson cautioned that undermining faith in these systems might hamper the transition from classical cryptography to more quantum-resistant solutions, putting sensitive data at risk over the long term.
Mini dictionary: Lattice cryptography, a branch of cryptography designed to withstand attacks from quantum computers, relies on complex mathematical lattice structures. It is considered a leading candidate for post-quantum security due to its strong resistance to quantum algorithmic advances.
AI’s impact on cryptographic security
The debate intensified after Justin Drake, a well-known Ethereum researcher, warned of an impending threat he called “bunker mode.” Drake suggested that advancements in artificial intelligence could soon pose risks to the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA), which is widely used for authorizing cryptocurrency transactions.
Drake outlined the possibility that a sufficiently powerful mathematical breakthrough—potentially discovered or accelerated by AI—could enable attackers to extract private keys from public keys far more efficiently than current estimates suggest.
Drake cautioned the crypto community that if AI continues to progress at its current rate, foundational cryptographic algorithms such as ECDSA could be compromised sooner than the industry anticipates.
Buterin later echoed Drake’s concerns, adding that the pace of AI-driven mathematical progress could reshape the landscape of cryptography. However, Buterin advised holders of cryptocurrencies to refrain from moving their assets preemptively, stating there is no immediate need for drastic action.
Mini dictionary: ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm) is the primary cryptographic algorithm used for transaction authorization in most major cryptocurrencies, valued for its efficiency and security. Potential breakthroughs in solving its underlying mathematical problems could jeopardize the safety of digital assets secured by ECDSA.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
XRP Weekly Chart Blue Lines Point to These Long-Term Price Targets

The 10-year US Treasury yield approaches 5.4%, with the AI halo unable to hide the "inflated" risks of the S&P 500
Behind the S&P 500's record high, only 30% of its constituent stocks are above their 50-day moving average, marking the narrowest market breadth at a record high since 1990. The Russell 2000 has fallen for five consecutive weeks, and high-yield bond yields have soared to 15%. Societe Generale warns that if US Treasury yields rise to 6% and oil prices reach $150, the S&P 500 could fall by more than 20% next year. In addition, some top-performing fund managers have completely exited AI stocks in favor of energy, stating that once financing dries up, it will be "game over."
Oil tanker freight reaches a sixty-year high: shipping oil from the US to China is more expensive than launching a rocket!
The freight for a single barrel of crude oil has soared to $41, approaching half the oil price, and for a single trip, the freight was once enough to buy an oil tanker. The Middle East crisis has led to a structural shortage of shipping capacity in the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with ship-to-ship transfers extending turnaround times. VLCC freight rates have skyrocketed from an annual average of $9.2 million to $77 million—an increase of more than eight times. Refiners’ profits are being rapidly eroded, the average price of second-hand oil tankers has reached a historic high, and, unusually, surpassed the price of new vessels.

Following the Drop but Not the Rise! Silver Trapped in Difficulties
The logic of AI and solar energy demand continues to play out, yet prices are falling against the trend—macroeconomic forces such as a strengthening US dollar and rising real interest rates have completely suppressed fundamentals. Speculative funds offloaded $1.6 billion in a single week, marking a yearly peak, while CTA net short positions reversed by $2.6 billion to the highest level this year. However, Goldman Sachs analysts believe that the extreme short positioning itself is building reversal momentum, highlighting an asymmetry; once macro headwinds subside, a retaliatory rebound could be easily triggered. After a similar shakeout last time, silver surged 15% in six weeks.
