Brian Armstrong: ‘Incumbents’ Are Trying to Kill Crypto Competition
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has accused “entrenched incumbents” of lobbying against the CLARITY Act, arguing that established financial players are trying to stop crypto companies from competing in US financial services.
His comments frame the fight over the bill as a contest between traditional firms protecting their position and crypto businesses seeking clearer rules.
Armstrong Puts Competition at Center of CLARITY Fight
He pointed to Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign promise to remove former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, recalling the reaction when Trump said at a Bitcoin conference that he would fire Gensler “on day one.”
He then ran through what he sees as progress since Trump took office: an executive order calling for clearer crypto rules, the appointment of SEC Chair Paul Atkins and CFTC Chair Mike Selig, and passage of the GENIUS Act for stablecoins. The CLARITY Act, Armstrong said, is the next piece.
“Make no mistake, there are people out there actively fighting against this,” Armstrong said. “There are entrenched incumbents who don’t want competition from crypto companies that would provide better financial services.”
He went further, alleging that some of those firms are “actively lobbying against it, trying to kill it.” The Coinbase chief also singled out Senator Elizabeth Warren, saying she is among those seeking to stop the legislation.
The Senate needs 60 votes for cloture, while Republicans hold 53 seats. That means if all of them support the measure, it would still leave them needing at least seven additional votes from Democrats or independents.
Furthermore, the bill still faces disputes over ethics rules, anti-money laundering provisions, and whether crypto companies can offer rewards on customer stablecoin holdings.
Banks Remain a Point of Tension
The banking industry’s concerns over stablecoin rewards sit close to Armstrong’s competition argument. The provision has drawn resistance from traditional lenders, who say such products could pull deposits away from banks.
That dispute helps explain why the CLARITY debate is about more than deciding which regulator handles crypto. The legislation would establish federal rules for digital assets, including how tokens are classified and where SEC and CFTC responsibilities begin and end.
With all that going on, Armstrong’s message is direct: the bill should pass because consumers and crypto firms need clearer rules, while established financial companies should not be able to block competitors through lobbying.
“It’s time to get the Clarity Act, which will protect consumers, over the finish line,” he wrote on X. “There’s something in it for everyone: banks, law enforcement, crypto companies, and most importantly the American people.”
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Strategy’s STRC plan could bring 365 dividend record dates – Details
Brazil’s New Crypto Rules Could Change the Market: 5 Altcoins Worth Holding as October Nears
With Q3 financial reports approaching, Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix face "extremely high expectations," testing "global AI trading"
The AI wave is driving a global semiconductor "super cycle," with combined third-quarter operating profits of Samsung and SK Hynix potentially approaching the historical record of 190 trillion won. The competition for HBM4 is intensifying, as agent-based AI pushes storage bandwidth demand up tenfold, making memory truly the "lifeblood" of AI data centers. Two upcoming financial reports will determine whether this boom is merely a flash in the pan or a structural transformation that will reshape the foundation of technology infrastructure.

‘Provide future qualification path’ — Strive challenges MSCI proposal to exclude Bitcoin treasuries
