Ex-Ripple CTO Makes Fresh Defense of Ripple’s Control Over XRP
The battle over what defines true decentralization has erupted again, and this time, XRP sits squarely in the spotlight. As blockchain networks compete for institutional relevance and ideological purity, critics and builders continue to clash over governance models.
The latest exchange highlights how deeply divided the crypto industry remains on the meaning of “permissionless.”
Former Ripple CTO David Schwartz publicly defended the XRP Ledger after crypto commentator Justin Bons accused several major networks of operating as centralized systems.
Bons argued that Ripple, alongside Canton, Stellar, Hedera, and Algorand, relies on validator structures that undermine decentralization. Schwartz directly challenged that claim and rejected the assertion that Ripple exercises absolute control over XRP.
"…effectively giving the Ripple Foundation & company absolute power & control over the chain…"
This is as objectively nonsensical as claiming someone with a majority of mining power can create a billion bitcoins.
— David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz (@JoelKatz) February 24, 2026
The Core of the Criticism
Bons focused his criticism on Ripple’s Unique Node List, commonly known as the UNL. He claimed that because many participants rely on a recommended validator list, divergence from it could cause a fork.
He argued that this structure effectively gives Ripple significant influence over network consensus. While he acknowledged that XRP’s supply cannot be arbitrarily inflated and funds cannot be stolen, he suggested that a dominant validator influence could theoretically enable double-spending or censorship.
Bons compared this scenario to a majority mining attack on Bitcoin, implying that concentrated control in any consensus system creates systemic risk.
Schwartz’s Technical Rebuttal
Schwartz firmly rejected the comparison. He stated that XRPL does not operate like proof-of-work networks and does not depend on mining power concentration. He explained that each node operator independently selects trusted validators. A node counts validator agreements and will not validate a double-spend or censorship attempt unless its operator deliberately configures it to do so.
Schwartz emphasized that no single entity can unilaterally force consensus changes across independently configured nodes. He described the claim that Ripple holds “absolute power” as technically unsound and fundamentally inconsistent with how XRPL consensus functions.
How XRPL Consensus Differs
The XRP Ledger uses a Byzantine Fault Tolerant consensus protocol. Validators propose transaction sets, and the network reaches agreement when a supermajority aligns. Ripple publishes a recommended UNL, but node operators retain full discretion to modify their lists. This flexibility, Schwartz argues, preserves decentralization while maintaining efficiency.
Unlike proof-of-work systems, XRPL does not reward mining dominance. Instead, it relies on distributed validator agreement, which reduces the risk of unilateral control.
The Broader Implications
This exchange reflects a wider ideological divide within crypto. Purists demand maximal permissionlessness, while enterprise-focused networks prioritize scalability and predictable governance. As adoption grows and institutional players enter the space, these debates will likely intensify.
For now, Schwartz maintains that the XRP Ledger resists centralized control by design. Whether critics accept that defense remains part of crypto’s ongoing evolution.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Dow Jones Industrial Average bounces on Iran's latest Hormuz offer
U.S. stocks opened higher and fluctuated, the Japanese yen rebounded more than 1% intraday, 10-year U.S. Treasury yields broke above 5.22% again, and U.S. crude oil once fell nearly 3%.
After the release of U.S. consumer confidence data, the S&P and Nasdaq turned negative, while the Dow is poised to break a three-day losing streak but is set for a fourth consecutive weekly decline. Meta pulled back, falling more than 3% during the session. The U.S. 10-year Treasury yield surpassed 5.22% again, marking a new high for the third day in a row since 2007, while the 30-year yield reached its highest level since 2004. The yen/dollar pair surged 1.2% intraday, as Japanese and U.S. officials successively signaled concerns over the weak yen. Expectations for a diplomatic resolution between the U.S. and Iran are rising, halting crude oil's two-day climb.
US Treasury volatility surges, triggering alarms! BofA’s Hartnett warns of rising deleveraging risks as higher yields become main threat to the market
Bank of America strategist Michael Hartnett warns that the recent sharp rise in volatility in the US bond market is increasing the risk of broader deleveraging in financial markets.
U.S. diesel prices surge 83% this year! Apollo Chief Economist warns: Cost pass-through may make core inflation more stubborn, Federal Reserve can't ignore it
Torsten Slok, Chief Economist at Apollo Global Management, has warned that the inflation threat posed by the surge in U.S. diesel prices to historic highs may be more serious than the Federal Reserve currently realizes.
Crypto prices
More
