SWIFT executive defends banks' role in the blockchain era
- Banks seek their own governance rather than external blockchains
- SWIFT sees public blockchains as an execution layer only.
- Cryptocurrencies spark debates on neutrality and institutional trust
SWIFT's Chief Innovation Officer, Tom Zschach, stated that traditional banks are unlikely to fully transfer transaction settlement to external blockchains or distributed systems. According to him, open source code and the transparency of public networks alone do not guarantee the trust required by financial institutions. For the executive, governance, compliance, and legal enforceability must be under the internal control of the entities themselves.
Zschach emphasized that while distributed ledgers offer programmability, financial institutions don't want to "live on a competitor's tracks." He classified public blockchains, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, as a "substrate," a useful technological foundation, but insufficient to meet the requirements of trusted settlement in the banking sector.
"Public blockchains are the baseline environment for execution. The transformation occurs when you add the layer of trust that makes the results legally enforceable, compliant, and safe to scale," the executive wrote in a LinkedIn post.
According to Zschach, the next stage of integration will not be crypto networks replacing the financial system, but rather the financial sector absorbing the best of public blockchains on its own terms.
The SWIFT executive also refuted the idea that tokens like XRP would be the ideal option for banks simply because they survive regulatory processes. In a comment that was later removed, he stated that "surviving lawsuits is not resilience," reinforcing that institutional trust depends on neutral and shared governance, not on a single company.
He added that neutrality in finance isn't defined by the number of nodes or simply being open source. He believes billion-dollar disputes can't be resolved by validators alone, but rather by solid legal frameworks, noting that SWIFT acts as a neutral intermediary between more than 11.000 global institutions.
Cryptocurrency entrepreneurs, however, disagreed. Evgeny Yurtaev, CEO of Zerion, argued that true neutrality comes from open protocols that ensure fairness through code. Similarly, Merlin Egalite, co-founder of Morpho, argued that DeFi infrastructure should have immutable code, minimal governance, and no bias, unlike the model adopted by SWIFT.
The discussion reinforces the gap between the vision of traditional finance and the proposal of cryptocurrencies, where decentralization is seen as the way to ensure equity and resilience.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The Capital Trends Behind the AI Computing Power Rebound: JPMorgan Fund Flows Reveal Retail Buy-In "Shrinking," Pouring Into Nvidia, SanDisk and Other Computing Power Core Companies
What has been revealed is not a "complete withdrawal of retail investors from AI," but rather a significant slowdown in overall market entry pace under macroeconomic pressure, with stock selections becoming more concentrated. In response to the Federal Reserve's unanimous decision to raise interest rates by 25 basis points, increasing the policy rate to 3.75%–4.00%, JPMorgan's assessment is: if this is simply a withdrawal of last year's "insurance-style rate cuts" during a shallow rate hike cycle—and if corporate earnings remain strong and the Middle East situation does not further spiral out of control—the stock market is still capable of absorbing rising interest rates.
Vote Result 7-2! Bank of Japan Raises Interest Rates at Fastest Pace Since 1990, Does Not Signal a Clearly More Hawkish Stance
The Bank of Japan has raised interest rates to 1.25%, marking the highest level since 1995 and the sixth increase since exiting the negative interest rate policy in March 2024. Out of the nine committee members, Asada and Sato voted against the hike, citing the current economic situation, reflecting ongoing internal disagreements over further tightening. In its statement, the Bank of Japan indicated it will continue to raise rates and adjust the degree of monetary easing, but the forward guidance language showed limited changes from the July statement, without sending notably more hawkish signals.
