Lido Staked ETHの‌価格

$GRVT Diva Staking is winding down without launching on Ethereum mainnet and has told depositors in its Early Staker Vaults to withdraw through Enzyme. “You can withdraw your deposits from Enzyme. There is nothing left to wait for,” the liquid staking project's team said in its Oct. 28 shutdown statement. The two vaults displayed a combined asset value of approximately 654.5 $ETH when checked on Oct. 28 ET, according to The Defiant's calculation from Enzyme's $ETH vault and stETH vault dashboards. denominated in $ETH; depositor counts are per vault, not a deduplicated total. The closure also leaves the original DIVA incentive schedule without the mainnet launch needed to trigger it. The shutdown statement announces no alternative distribution for early stakers. Diva said it ran out of funds in mid-2024. Three people had continued working without revenue or salaries, but could not afford new audits or launch and maintain the protocol, the team said. It cited the risk of vulnerabilities slipping past earlier audits as a reason not to launch. DIVA Rewards Depended on Mainnet Under the DAO-approved DIP-02 terms, early deposits established a place in a queue, with earlier participants receiving higher reward rates. DIVA accrual was to begin only 30 days before the formal mainnet launch date, determined retrospectively once that date was known—not throughout the wait for launch. The terms also required deposited assets to be converted into divETH, Diva's planned liquid staking token. Anyone redeeming before that conversion was complete would not qualify for DIVA distributions under those terms. With mainnet cancelled, the original schedule cannot proceed as written. Withdrawing the Pre-Launch Deposits Diva's documentation described two Enzyme vaults: $ETH deposits were held idle before launch, while stETH deposits continued earning their existing Ethereum staking rewards. Conversion into divETH was supposed to follow the mainnet launch. Depositors received vault shares representing proportional ownership of the underlying assets. DIP-02 allowed withdrawals at any time, subject to a default 24-hour lock-up in the vault settings. Enzyme's withdrawal instructions tell depositors to connect their wallet, select the vault's “Withdrawal” button and sign the transaction. Diva's shutdown statement sets no withdrawal deadline.

$GRVT Asset manager VanEck said it no longer plans to proceed with its proposed Lido staked Ether exchange-traded fund, shelving the product designed to give investors exposure to the liquid staking token. In an SEC filing on Wednesday, VanEck Digital Assets said it “does not intend to proceed with the planned distribution” of the trust’s shares. It did not explain what prompted the decision or whether VanEck would pursue a replacement product. VanEck initially filed the fund’s S-1 registration statement on Oct. 16, 2025. The proposed fund would have held Lido staked Ether (stETH) and would expect to accrue certain staking rewards through ownership of stETH. Cointelegraph reached out to VanEck Digital Assets for comment. Related: VanEck criticizes Metaplanet over executive dilution despite compensation cuts

MetaMask Hack? Ethereum Validators Exit After Security Incident MetaMask has started exiting affected Ethereum validators following an infrastructure security incident involving its non-custodial staking operations with Lido. All affected validators are expected to exit by October 7, while the full withdrawal process could take up to ~45 days. Lido says $stETH holders need no action, while Aave reports no market impact so far. The exact attack vector remains under investigation.

$GRVT Lido’s long-running effort to give stETH holders more influence over protocol governance has moved another step forward. Onchain Vote #214 has passed, implementing parameters associated with Lido’s Dual Governance system on Ethereum mainnet. The vote received support from 58.2 million LDO participating tokens. Dual Governance Creates A Second Check On LDO Holders Traditional DAO governance gives voting power to holders of the governance token. For Lido, that means LDO. The complication is that the people economically exposed to the staking protocol are not necessarily the same people holding large amounts of LDO. stETH holders may have substantial value inside Lido while having little direct ability to stop governance decisions that affect the protocol. Dual Governance is designed to narrow that gap. The framework gives stETH holders a mechanism to contest or delay certain governance actions before they are executed. That does not replace LDO voting. It creates an additional check around it. The idea is particularly important for a liquid staking protocol because governance controls smart contracts handling very large amounts of user-deposited ETH. The Delay Window Is Part Of The Security Model Vote #214 also extends the relevant emergency governance delay window to 14 days. A longer delay gives stakeholders more time to respond when an action is disputed. That can make governance slower. It can also make a hostile or controversial change harder to rush through before affected users have time to react. Lido has been developing Dual Governance as a way to reduce one of the structural risks around decentralized protocols: governance-token holders making decisions that may not align with the interests of users whose assets sit inside the system. The latest vote does not make Lido governance perfectly decentralized or remove every governance risk. It does change the balance. LDO remains the governance token, but stETH holders now have a more meaningful role in the safety architecture around major decisions. For a protocol whose main product represents staked ETH, that is a significant shift in who gets a voice when governance and user capital collide. This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.